Reflection on Repeatedly Reading a Book of the Bible


I had posted a while back about some recommended ways of reading the Bible.  With my schedule the way it has been lately, I rarely stick with one method strictly.  If I have more time, I jump to a method that allows more reading.  If I have less time, I may just read through a few chapters or something along those lines. But I do try to stay in the word every day.

I have, however, for the first time finished reading through one book of the Bible 30 times in a relatively short time (more than a month, however).  This is the method recommended by John MacArthur (and a few others).  I read through Philippians this way.  Technically, I have probably read through the Sermon on the Mount and 1 John about that many times through my memorization, but in my mind that was a little different, although both focus on absorbing and understanding the material more than just reading for information and knowledge.

I found pros and cons to this method, although really, I suppose, there are more pros than cons in my mind.

The first pro, of course, is familiarity with the text.  Sometimes when I am reading through the Bible in larger chunks, my mind tends to forget more than I remember of what I read.  Reading a book (or part of a book) repeatedly allowed me to slow down, focus on the specifics more, and begin to really grasp the overall flow and connection of the text.  While I have not memorized Philippians (although that is still my next goal), I am very familiar with what is in the book now and have memorized certain phrases and parts of it.  I can connect to all the parts much better, and have a basic outline in my mind of the text.

Another pro, and one that builds off of the previous one, is that I am less likely to misunderstand the contextual meaning of part of the book.  We all have verses from different books that we love, and while it is not wrong to memorize standalone verses, we have to be careful that we don’t change their original meaning by divorcing them from the surrounding context.  This focus on context doesn’t limit the meaning of a text or rob it of meaning.  In reality, it expands on the meaning by helping us better understand what was originally intended rather than putting meaning into it that is alien to the author’s original thoughts.

Since I was becoming more familiar with the text and was understanding it contextually, I also begin to carry it with me in my mind and meditate on it more.  Because I was not reading large and various portions at one time, I could focus my thoughts more, allowing the word of God to work in me more deeply and dwell in me more richly.  This allowed the text to take root as I stored it in my heart, and it began to come back to mind at the Spirit’s prompting when I needed it most.  This allows the word to challenge, convict, and change me.  This is, after all, the real intention of our reading of the word anyway, isn’t it?  Aren’t we reading for transformation rather than merely for information (as D. L. Moody said, I believe)?  What better way than focusing on one portion of Scripture until we begin to master it (or rather it begins to master us)?

Now, there are some cons, I think.  One is that it is easier for my mind to wander if I am not careful while using this method.  Reading a portion repeatedly begins to make me feel a little too comfortable with the text, so I have to be very active to keep my mind from wandering as I am reading, thinking that I have already read that portion enough.  I have learned to overcome this in some ways from my memorization of Scripture, since the process is very similar.  I have been able to train my mind to focus on familiar text more, but it still requires effort on occasion.

Another con is that I wasn’t reading widely since I was reading deeply.  So where I might have covered a lot more Scripture in the time it took to read Philippians 30 times, I didn’t.  This leads me to feel like I am missing out on something, as there is a lot more Scripture I am not reading.  This is a trade off, I suppose.  Breadth or depth.  If I have time to read a few chapters straight through with the repeated reading of a book, that would solve the problem.  But there is that time issue again.  While this is a con in some ways, if I go back to what I said above, perhaps it isn’t so bad not to be reading as widely.  Again, the goal is not reading for the sake of reading; the goal is to know God’s word so I can be transformed, and that requires time and familiarity.

One last con is that to stick with this plan long term (if I follow MacArthur’s plan strictly) would mean I really don’t come back to Philippians for about 2 to 3 years.  I can always read through it again whenever I wish, of course, but that just delays working through other books when I do that, unless I have extra time one day.  Granted, this con is a small one, but it is still real.

Ideally, I would love to read a portion of the New Testament repetitively, a few chapters of the Old Testament straight through each day, and a psalm and proverb every day, but that usually doesn’t work well on week nights.  I have actually found myself wondering, however, if reading a book repeatedly if that is all I have time for may be the best option?

I am considering following the same process with Matthew’s gospel next.  If I do, I have to decide whether I will read chapters 1 through 7 for 30 days first, then move on to 8 through 14, and so on, or if it would be better to do 7 chapters each day through the book and start over every 4 days.  Either way, it will take 4 months to read through the gospel of Matthew 30 times that way, if I don’t miss a day.  Still, the idea of being as familiar with a gospel as I am now with Philippians is exciting.  Perhaps it will work.

If you have never tried reading this way, I would encourage you to pick a small yet powerful book of the New Testament (like Philippians, 1 John, or Colossians) and give it a try.  If you do, let me know what you think!


14 thoughts on “Reflection on Repeatedly Reading a Book of the Bible

    • Thanks for the question!

      I bounce back and forth with reading plans. The main ones I use are the one mentioned in this post, repeatedly reading a book or part of one for a month, the Grant Horner plan, and a rapid Bible read-through (as Keith Ferrin terms it).

      They all have strengths and weaknesses, and they are good at different times.

      If I am focusing more on memorizing Scripture passages or books, I am more likely to read broadly, since I am already internalizing Scripture through memorization. If I am not actively memorizing, I may read something repeatedly to indirectly internalize it.

      I hope this helps.

      Do you have a specific plan you use? Have you tried reading a book repeatedly?


      • Hi!
        Yes i read one year old testament , psalms and proverbs and a new testament book repeatedly for 20 days.
        I wanted to ask what you do with big books like romans?
        Do you read first 8 chapters 20 days and then chapter 8016 the second twenty?
        Or 1-8 the first day ,9-16 the second and so on?

        Liked by 2 people

      • The only long book I have tried this plan with is the gospel of John. At this point, I have been reading chapters 1-7 repeatedly, with the plan being to go to 8-14 next for 30 times, and 15-21 after that for 30 times.

        I taught English Language Arts for 6 years, and when we would read a novel, I was usually reading the same pages/chapters each class for multiple classes in a day. As a result, I built up a knowledge of the novel segment by segment. The downside was that until I was familiar enough with the book, things didn’t click all the way through.

        When I get to another long book, I may try reading it all the way through a couple times and then start breaking it down into segments of chapters. That way I have a rough working knowledge of the whole before starting to repeatedly read portions of it.

        It seems to me that it could be harder to read the entire thing (21 chapters, in the case of John’s gospel) and then start over. I feel I might get lost in all the information.

        On the other hand, I suppose that is how we watch our favorite movies, beginning to end, building up more of an intimate knowledge of the parts as we go.

        Have you read long books of the New Testament? If so, how do you prefer repeatedly reading them? By breaking them into segments and focusing on a segment for a while, or by reading beginning to end and starting over repeatedly?

        Liked by 1 person

  1. Look .(i write it again)
    I will do something like you said! before i was thinking to do just the opposite (first the segments and then the whole)
    But i will do that:I will read it for an overview and then just repeat the same segment. And then maybe do a final (1-2 times) synthetic reading. Something like that: (2-3 times the whole book like day 1 chapters 1-8 then day 2 chapter 9-16 and so on. Then reading just the first segment 1-8 repeating and then the next)Thank you for the idea. Tell me how you see it?

    For your question i have read genesis with that way. I broke it in segments of 10-12 chapters and i read it all. Then i started again and again and so on.
    As a result in the beginning i felt lost in the information , but by the second reading was better and bu the third even better and so on. Until i had the content clear to my mind and then i was able to meditate even in the smallest details of the book!

    I recommend you two books of James Gray. (free to read online)
    He explain his method in a book just 305 pages and in his second book he has a plan that you can walk with him with this kind of bible reading.
    The first book is :how to master the English bible” and the second “synthetic bible studies”
    If you want tell me to email you.
    God bless.


    Liked by 1 person

    • I think your idea sounds great!

      I have read (and thoroughly enjoyed) “Howto Master the English Bible.” I need to reread it. I have not read his “Synthetic Bible Studies.” I will look it up.

      Thanks for the recommendations!

      Liked by 1 person

      • I think that i can not post any site.
        I can send you the address to read it online. It deals with the same manner of reading as the “how to master the english bible” and then he give you the “lessons” for you to read alone with the bible and when you finished the given segment you read his comments (actual a guide to learn you make the Outline so you can keep it in mind)
        He said:
        “The first thing expected of you is that you will read the Scripture covered by lesson assigned.”
        “The second rule is, read the Scripture lesson continuously.”
        “The third rule is, read the lesson repeatedly.”
        “The fourth rule is, read the lesson independently.”
        “The last rule, but not the least by any means, is to read the lesson prayerfully.”

        -Thank you for the courage you gave me.
        I was looking for somebody follow this way of reading and at 10 persons i found the 5 abandoned the plan altogether .
        God bless you!

        Liked by 1 person

      • I found links to both books last night. The one on synthetic Bible reading looks very interesting!

        I’m glad I could be an encouragement. As I mentioned before, I don’t use this plan exclusively, but it is one of my top 3 that I keep coming back to. The benefits are great for it! But it does have weaknesses, as does any plan.

        God bless you as you read His word!

        Liked by 1 person

    • I am doing well! I hope you are, too.

      To an extent, they are already combined. The Horner plan requires that you start a list over once you finish it, thereby creating built-in repetition. So since the gospels are a list, every 90 days (roughly) you will start that list over, meaning you will read the gospels 4 times in a year-long period. The same can be said for the other lists.

      If you mean combining them by doing the complete Horner plan and the repeated one, I’m not sure. The Horner plan alone is 10 chapters per day, and takes most people 35-45 minutes. The repeated plan can be between 4 and 8 chapters a day, and it can take an additional 25-35 minutes. So I suppose it could theoretically be done for someone who has that much time. But that would be a lot to commit to.

      If you like the variation of the Horner plan, stick with it. You will get repetition in the long run, though it is a little more fragmented by the different lists. But many people use it successfully as their ongoing plan.

      Another option is to use the Horner plan for as long as you feel you should, and then if you want/need a break, then pick a book or section to read repeatedly for a month or so and then jump pack in to the Horner plan.

      I hope this helps! Keep seeking God in His word!



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s