I love apologetics. I love reading on various arguments, explanations, and ideas on explaining and defending a Christian worldview. Naturally, I was very excited when David C. Cook publishers offered to provide a copy of God’s Crime Scene by J. Warner Wallace for me to read and review. I have read Wallace’s previous book Cold-Case Christianity, and I enjoyed it immensely. This, too, was a good book by Wallace.
God’s Crime Scene argues for the existence of God from the ground up. In the book, Wallace uses his experience as a cold-case detective to examine the evidence we see in creation to determine whether it points to a Creator or not. As such, the book is intended to help those who question God’s existence see good arguments as to why He does exist.
The chapters examine the beginning of the universe, the fine tuning of the universe, the origin of life, the appearance of design in creation, the existence of consciousness, the existence of free will, the existence of morality, and the problem of evil. As Wallace concludes each chapter, he puts together an “Emerging ‘Suspect’ Profile.” Ultimately, Wallace argues that the “Suspect” (quotes in Wallace’s book) responsible for the world as we know it is:
- “external to the universe
- nonspatial, atemporal, and nonmaterial
- powerful enough to create everything we see in the universe
- specifically purposeful enough to produce a universe fine-tuned for life
- intelligent and communicative
- creative and resourceful
- a conscious Mind
- free to choose (and create) personally
- the personal source of moral truth and obligation
- the standard for good by which we define evil” (p. 193)
The layout of each chapter is to start with a legal case and the accompanying evidence as a way of analogy to the evidence to be examined from Creation. Wallace then tackles all of the attempts to explain the evidence by looking “inside the room,” or looking only at natural, material causes. He shows why those explanations fail to explain the evidence before looking elsewhere for an explanation for the evidence in question. In the margins of the chapter Wallace includes “Expert Witness Profiles” (small biographical bits regarding people he cites in the book), “Cold Case Approach” information (explaining how a cold-case detective would look at evidence), and “A Tool for the Call-Out Bag” (extra tips to explain how detectives and jurors look at evidence to make decisions).
There are many selling points for those who wish to go deeper. There are copious notes throughout, and often these notes add more information (full quotes from authors, explanations, etc.) rather than just citations as to where Wallace got information from. Another inclusion is a section for each chapter in the back of the book called “The Secondary Investigation.” This section will take the information discussed in each chapter and go in more detail. Finally, Wallace includes “Case Files: The Expert Witnesses.” This section is a small bibliography for each chapter, providing titles of books that provide more information for those arguing from “inside the room” (the naturalistic arguments) and those arguing “outside the room” (the theistic arguments). I especially like the fact that Wallace is willing to include titles that would argue against his case for others to read, as it shows that Wallace believes his arguments will stand up under scrutiny.
Who will benefit most from this book? First, those who are atheist or agnostic who are open to considering other viewpoints will benefit. Second, Christians/theists who are looking for assistance in understanding how to argue for a Creator.
I do need to take a minute to clarify a few things for people to understand if they are trying to decide whether or not to read this book.
First, this book takes an Intelligent Design approach, as far as I can tell. It assumes modern scientific understanding of things such as the age of the earth and universe, the Big Bang, etc. Young-Earth Creationists (YECs) are still able to use things from the book that don’t require a YEC stance. But they will have issues with some of the assumptions that Wallace (and those he cites) makes.
Second, because it takes an Intelligent Design approach to arguing for the existence of God, it will fit in more with someone who holds to classical apologetics or cumulative case apologetics. Presuppositionalists may have issues with the way Wallace makes his case. As far as I can recall, no Scripture is cited in the text itself, and the only Scripture referenced is in the notes for the “Closing Argument.” For classical apologists, this is a plus, as it shows that one can potentially argue for a theistic understanding of God without quoting chapter and verse. For presuppositionalists, this may likely be a downside, as it doesn’t start from what they consider the ultimate authority to make the argument. I still think anyone can glean much good from the book, but it was a point worth mentioning for those who take things like the above into account.
The last thing that potential readers need to note is that this book will not provide evidence to take someone all the way to considering Christianity. It is not intended to. Wallace himself points this out in the book:
“If the evidence in this book has been compelling to you and you’ve decided a Divine Creator is the best explanation for the evidence in the universe, you’re now among the vast majority of people on our planet who accept that proposition. But given the variety of theistic worldviews available, which, if any of them, is true? The case for God’s existence presented in this book might apply to a number of religious systems positing a personal God, particularly the monotheistic traditions such as Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. I would encourage you to investigate the claims of these systems with equal vigor.” (p. 203)
Wallace goes on to explain how he came to believe in Christianity, and he points out that he talks about how he came to that conclusion in Cold-Case Christianity, so he does point people to reading that could take them further. For those considering this book, however, please understand that it does not argue all the way to Christianity; it stops with the existence of some form of a Creator.
Overall, this is a good book to read for those interested in arguments for the existence of a Creator/Intelligent Designer. The layout and methodology is definitely unique, and it would make a good addition to anyone’s library who is interested in apologetics.
Note: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher in exchange for my honest review.